* Appendix: Anarchism and “anarcho”-capitalism
** Replies to Some Errors and Distortions in Bryan Caplan’s “Anarchist Theory FAQ” version 5.2
*** 1. Individualist Anarchists and the socialist movement.
*** 2. Why is Caplan’s definition of socialism wrong?
*** 3. Was Proudhon a socialist or a capitalist?
*** 4. Tucker on Property, Communism and Socialism.
*** 5. Anarchism and “anarcho”-capitalism
*** 6. Appendix: Defining Anarchism
** Replies to Some Errors and Distortions in Bryan Caplan’s “Anarchist Theory FAQ” version 4.1.1.
*** 1 Is anarchism purely negative?
*** 2 Anarchism and Equality
*** 3 Is anarchism the same thing as socialism?
*** 4 Anarchism and dissidents
*** 5 How would anarcho-capitalism work?
** Is “anarcho”-capitalism a type of anarchism?
*** 1 Are “anarcho”-capitalists really anarchists?
**** 1.1 Why is the failure to renounce hierarchy the Achilles Heel of right-wing libertarianism
**** 1.2 How libertarian is right-Libertarian theory?
**** 1.3 Is right-Libertarian theory scientific in nature?
**** 1.4 Is “anarcho”-capitalism a new form of individualist anarchism?
*** 2 What do “anarcho”-capitalists mean by “freedom”?
**** 2.1 What are the implications of defining liberty in terms of (property) rights?
**** 2.2 How does private property affect freedom?
**** 2.3 Can “anarcho”-capitalist theory justify the state?
**** 2.4 But surely transactions on the market are voluntary?
**** 2.5 But surely circumstances are the result of liberty and so cannot be objected to?
**** 2.6 Do Libertarian-capitalists support slavery?
**** 2.7 But surely abolishing capitalism would restrict liberty?
**** 2.8 Why should we reject the “anarcho”-capitalist definitions of freedom and justice?
*** 3 Why do anarcho”-capitalists place little or no value on “equality”?
**** 3.1 Why is this disregard for equality important?
**** 3.2 But what about “anarcho”-capitalist support for charity?
*** 4 What is the right-libertarian position on private property?
**** 4.1 What is wrong with a “homesteading” theory of property?
**** 4.2 Why is the “Lockean Proviso” important?
**** 4.3 How does private property effect individualism?
**** 4.4 How does private property affect relationships?
**** 4.5 Does private property co-ordinate without hierarchy?
*** 5 Will privatising “the commons” increase liberty?
*** 6 Is “anarcho”-capitalism against the state?
**** 6.1 What’s wrong with this “free market” justice?
**** 6.2 What are the social consequences of such a system?
**** 6.3 But surely market forces will stop abuses by the rich?
**** 6.4 Why are these “defence associations” states?
**** 6.5 What other effects would “free market” justice have?
*** 7 How does the history of “anarcho”-capitalism show that it is not anarchist?
**** 7.1 Are competing governments anarchism?
**** 7.2 Is government compatible with anarchism?
**** 7.3 Can there be a “right-wing” anarchism?
*** 8 What role did the state take in the creation of capitalism?
**** 8.1 What social forces lay behind the rise of capitalism?
**** 8.2 What was the social context of the statement “laissez-faire?”
**** 8.3 What other forms did state intervention in creating capitalism take?
**** 8.4 Aren’t the enclosures a socialist myth?
**** 8.5 What about the lack of enclosures in the Americas?
**** 8.6 How did working people view the rise of capitalism?
**** 8.7 Why is the history of capitalism important?
*** 9 Is Medieval Iceland an example of “anarcho”-capitalism working in practice?
*** 10 Would laissez-faire capitalism be stable?
**** 10.1 Would privatising banking make capitalism stable?
**** 10.2 How does the labour market effect capitalism?
**** 10.3 Was laissez-faire capitalism stable?
*** 11 What is the myth of “Natural Law”?
**** 11.1 Why the term “Natural Law” in the first place?
**** 11.2 But “Natural Law” provides protection for individual rights from violation by the State. Those who are against Natural Law desire total rule by the state.
**** 11.3 Why is “Natural Law” authoritarian?
**** 11.4 Does “Natural Law” actually provides protection for individual liberty?
**** 11.5 But Natural Law was discovered, not invented!
**** 11.6 Why is the notion of “discovery” contradictory?